MENGUKUR KEPUASAN KERJA
Sari
Conclusion of this description is, that satisfaction of some one in working very have the character of and abstraction of individualis, because this matter relate to motivational level and type and also requirement of is each individual. But that way labour and guarantee appearance satisfaction of activity in officer x'self is to represent matter which must be paid attention by company management party.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Alo Liliweri. (1997). Sosiologi organisasi, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.
Gerungan, W.A. (1991). Psikologi sosial, Bandung : T Eresco.
Hani Handoko. (1984). Manajemen. Edisi 2, Yogyakarta : BPFE UGM.
Herzberg, Frederick. (1981) The Motivation to Work, John Wiley and Sons.
New York
Husaini Usman (1997) Kepuasan Kerja. Makalah Seminar, 6 September 1997
Maslow, Abraham .H. (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation, Psychological
Review, July 1943
Mc Calland, Davis,C. (1962) Business Drive and National Achievement.
Harvard Bussiness Review. July-Agustus 1962
Mamduh M Hanafi. (1997). Manajemen, Yogyakarta : UPP AMP YKPN.
Nahavandi Afsaneh (1997). The art and science of leadership. Canada :
Prentice-Hall International.
Ngalim Purwanto (1985). Ilmu pendidikan : Teoritis dan praktis,
Bandung :Remadja Karya .
_______________ (1989). Administrasi pendidikan.Jakarta : Mutiara.
Oteng Sutisna. (1987). Administrasi pendidikan : dasar teoritis untuk praktek
profesional. Bandung : Angkasa.
Panji Anoraga. (1995). Perilaku keorganisasian. Jakarta : Pustaka Jaya.
Simamora. Henry (1997). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta :
STIE
Stonner J.A.F. (1982). Management, New York : Prentice Hall International,
Inc, Englewood Cliffs.
Sutemeiter. Robert. A. (1976) People and Prodctivity. Third Edition. New
York: McGraw Hill Book Company
Winardi. (2000). Kepemimpinan dalam manajemen, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Yukl G.. (2001). Leadership in organizations. New Jersey : Prentice Hall,
Upper Sadde River.
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.